![]() ![]() The actual killer committed suicide months after the murder after confessing. I already know who the actual killer was - who spent years framing the accused guy. I will eventually take care of it when I have the time and money to take a trip. One tiny technical lie to the jury resulting in a sentencing that will keep this man in prison for roughly 50 years at which time he will die of old age.ĭon't worry. ![]() By having that additional charge, the man who would be eligible for parole is NOT eligible for parole because of a "dangerous offender" designation. Since the idiot computer experts told the jury he sent it, the accused got convicted of an additional charge of a few years. One of the charges against the accused was based upon him sending this file (which he did not). The person who posted it did so from an account on opposite side of the planet (Australia) and continues to post messages and files to this day. In that trial, it was absurd, because they blamed the accused person of sending that file, when he was in custody at the time it was sent, and in a different country. that file is always going to have the same hashes. and whoever received that file sent it someplace else. If I sent a file to you, and you sent that file to someone else without editing it or re-encoding it and it still had the same file length. however, just because the hashes were the SAME doesn't mean squat. WRONG! If the hashes were different, then it would be impossible for the accused to be the source for all instances of the file. So, it IS possible to have the same checksum even though the data is not completely the same, but so unlikely for a long file that it is virtually impossible.Īnyway, in the trial, they misled the jury into thinking that the falsely accused person sent a file to multiple destinations because the hashes were identical. the data 502 mod 20 would be 2 (502 - 25 rollovers of 20). The checksum is a value created by adding up every byte of the data. Two different pictures can have exactly the same length. However, just because the file length is identical, the data might not be the same. For a hash of a file to be identical, the file length has to be identical. a "hash" is a checksum to indicate that a file is the same rather than comparing every byte of the file to check that they are the same. They were telling the jury that if you found a file on two different computers with the same hashes, then the file had to come from the same person. This reminds me of a murder trial in which their computer "experts" were ignorant. but the files the torrents are linked to are 100% identical. The torrent's hashes would be different because they are not the same torrents. I think a working MANUAL fix is to add the tracker from one of the torrents to the other, and nuke the other torrent. I meant the files contained in two different torrents are identical. When I do the above, I do get the 2 trackers on the same file BUT on the added one, it says UNREGISTERED TORRENT instead of WORKING What you have done is taken the existing filename and tracker from Torrent A, and added them to Torrent B. Then remove Torrent A (but not it's data) When loading Torrent B, I must change the download NAME to Star Wars.mp4 then click on ADVANCED and add the tracker from Torrent A which is (with a blank line between the two trackers as is required) Torrent B contains the file StarWars-NewHope.mp4 with a length of 654,127 with a tracker Torrent A contains the file Star Wars.mp4 with a length of 654,127 with a tracker UPDATE: The MANUAL fix that works is this: Sometimes the file NAMES are not exactly the same, it would be nice if utorrent would either assign both to the same name, or allow the user to pick one name or the other. I can do it manually, but that is a lot of work. IDEALLY Utorrent would automatically combine the trackers of the two sources. This would also help complete torrents that are incomplete on another site. It would be nice if files were aware of each other's "twin" and complete together. I can force it to see it by moving files around, but that is tedious. One site is typically faster than the other, or neither is complete, or other reasons.Įven though I download them with the SAME NAME and to the SAME DIRECTORY, when one of them completes and gets moved to a finished directory, the incomplete one is not "aware" of the other one. ![]() Quite often, I will find the same FILES on more than one site. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |